Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems.
It is commonly argued that traffic congestion results from overcrowding in big cities. However, improving the public transportation system can be the preferable solution to tackle this issue.
The emergence of traffic jams is one of the impacts of overpopulation, reducing one’s quality of life. As more people stay in the city, the higher mobility would be, which increases the volumes of private vehicles on the road. According to the survey done by McKinsey in 2005, 1 out of 3 Jakarta workers suffered from severe stress due to spending more than 4 hours in traffic daily. The following research found that severe traffic jams happened due to increased private cars in protocol streets by 20% due to massive urbanization in 1998, which increased Jakarta’s population density by up to 1000.000 people. Thus, overpopulation in urban cities lowers people’s quality of life.
However, improving the quality of public transportation could be a solution to overpopulation in metropolitan areas as people would prefer to use public transportation to commute daily. This would lead to less crowded private vehicle volumes on the road, preventing severe traffic congestion. As what was done by the government in New York City to reduce the traffic congestion problem in Brooklyn in 2007 was to add more bus fleet facilities to attract people using public transportation. This strategy worked as proven to decrease the volume of private cars on several Brookly roads although the population kept gradually increasing over the years. Hence, upgrading the quality of public transportation solves traffic jams issues.
To conclude, overpopulation in city centers may lead to traffic congestion. However, bettering the quality of its transportation system could be the solution to tackle that issue. Thus, allocating more budget to the city infrastructure is necessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-15 | myduyen282 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-16 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1989 to 2007 73
- Some people think it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis and swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the city The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 78
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., preventing severe traffic congestion. As what was done by the government in New ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45017182131 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09747639376 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5347985127 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.090525730892 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326805363931 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399044788632 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538145462479 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123313358898 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.