Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the importance of parenteral presence in children’s education has been gaining a great deal of attention throughout society. It is true that children cannot grow up perfectly without a parenteral presence. Most importantly, the issue has become a bone of contention among academic and psychological experts regarding its necessity to form a strong family. I completely agree with the school of thought and it seems to me that parenteral involvement in children’s education is a natural way to build an intimate relationship among the family and also improves self-confidence of children.
First of all, parenteral participation in adolescents’ learning will help to build a strong family relationship. Though, parents in our time are far busier than ever before, spending quality time with children to assist their home work might be a way to form the family bond. This means children will not only learn new things but also feel the warmth of family bonding and at the same time, parents will understand their children in a better way. This can be exemplified by the initiatives in Taiwan for the last few decades where parenteral present is encouraged to form a strong family. This is reflected in Taiwan’s bonding of families where averagely of only 2% of divorced cases were found in last five years.
Secondly, parenteral guidance inevitably develops the self-confidence of children. This means doing homework with teen-agers will help the parents to understand their children’s strengths and weaknesses in a particular subject and can act accordingly. As a result, self-confidence of youngsters will be enhanced significantly and it could be a great trigger to release the inner potentiality of kids in their next period of life. An empirical survey conducted in the UK last year reflects the same notion. The survey shows that children who had parent’s guidance in doing homework were 40% more confident in their task compared to those who were not supervised directly by their parents. Therefore, having parenteral observation in helping home task might be an important initiative for the well-being of young aspirants.
All things considered, parenteral present in children education is essential to form an intimate family bond and to improve self-confidence of children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | ashik031123 | 73 | view |
| 2018-05-04 | xuan le ngoc | 88 | view |
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 89
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework Do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finish high school Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed 78
- Some people believe that technology has made the world a better place while others think it has caused more problems than it has solved Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o improves self-confidence of children. First of all, parenteral participation i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is encouraged to form a strong family. This is reflected in Taiwan’s bonding of fam...
^^^^
Line 11, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to improve self-confidence of children.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38356164384 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16221357132 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53698630137 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5901773832 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261753846042 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824022431692 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939994762578 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144826853391 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761108397037 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o improves self-confidence of children. First of all, parenteral participation i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is encouraged to form a strong family. This is reflected in Taiwan’s bonding of fam...
^^^^
Line 11, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to improve self-confidence of children.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38356164384 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16221357132 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53698630137 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5901773832 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261753846042 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824022431692 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939994762578 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144826853391 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761108397037 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.