In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development

With technological advancements, computers, the internet and smartphones have become a need of the hour. Their usage has significantly increased over the past few years because everything is easily accessible in a matter of few clicks.

On the one hand, there are some positive aspects of working from home. People are able to save the money that they were spending on their commute. More importantly, people who work from home are saving a lot of their time and energy. That may lead to an increase in productivity. Secondly, not only employees benefit by working from home but businesses have also profited from this trend. Some businesses do not require an office anymore to operate. As a result, employers are able to cut down the operational costs like paying rent of their office, office utility bills, etc. This makes the business prosper.

On the other hand, despite these advantages, there are some negative aspects of working from home as well. Working from home requires a fair amount of technological awareness. Not all people are familiar with technologies like computers, the internet, and smartphones. Due to the lack of technological knowledge and interest, their ability to perform may hinder that ultimately affects the business. Secondly, working from home reduces the interaction of the employees with their colleagues and management. This may lead to a drop in team performance which increases the probability of getting overlooked for things such as promotions and pay raises.

In conclusion, though there are advantages of working from home it has its own drawbacks as well. So employees should decide very carefully if they want to work from home or travel to the office.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y accessible in a matter of few clicks. On the one hand, there are some positive...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1847826087 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87167568051 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5192446121 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.5 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346288949585 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105613093923 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708872433175 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196164740086 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052629322269 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.