In the past, people stored knowledge in books, nowadays people store knowledge on the internet. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In modern times, it is argued that the internet has gradually substituted books for the purpose of knowledge storage. Although, there are many pros and cons, I find myself in complete agreement with this trend by benefits shadowing the downside.
On the one hand, the era of rapidly technological developments involving the internet is advantageous as a major reservoir of knowledge from various perspectives. Mass media enables people to access unlimited resource of valuable knowledge without unlimited geographical constraints, more precisely, citizens all over the world find quickly data from source via the internet instead of looking for those on paper-based information sources. By doing so, people do not squander their quality time on grasping necessary information through books. It is reasonable to understand deeply why some people have a tendency to upload loads of valuable expertise on the internet compared to publishing books. Furthermore, storing knowledge on social networks help people released themselves from carrying a pile of paper books around day in and day out which become a burden on their shoulders, especially children, having a detriment impacts on children’s bond developments.
On the other hand, a wide range of information in a certain field supplied by loads of resource on the internet can make people confuse and be hard to determinate reliable and correct data. Therefore, residents may have much fake information which have a significant effect on their tasks. It is true that a paper-based information storage method will narrow down the size of knowledge which help readers easily pick up precisely needed things. Moreover, some people share an idea that looking for knowledge through books is safe more than online because downloading data having a huge amount of virus results in unexpected problems for several modern gadgets.
In conclusion, although people may gain incorrect knowledge via online, there is a wealth of advantages given fast-paced development of mass media which help knowledge storage become convenient and quick in comparison with publishing books.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as human while others argue that human must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food research Discuss bot 73
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 84
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age group used to get daily news in one country in 2011 84
- The use of mobile phone should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- In some countries university students live at home while in other countries university students go to other cities rather than live with their family Do you think the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ck in comparison with publishing books.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49235474006 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95502104394 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60244648318 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5764564796 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.666666667 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280898661808 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963095651863 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533828526981 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161027885385 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636414717332 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.