People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
There are increasing the trend of sugary drinks consumption in recent years. the high additive ingredients in these beverages and appealing advertising are the major reason for the matter, and several feasible measures can be implemented to minimize the intake of drinks with added sugar.
In term of the fundamental cause behind the rise the consumption of sweetened drinks, sugar and caffeine, the most additive properties found in virtual soft drinks, are considered as the main culprits. These kinds of beverages are deemed as indispensable drinks in gourmet meals, and especially parties which make people likely enjoy more. Moreover, these substances give them an instant energy boost to help them stay focus more effectively on their work. Another reason is heavy marketing. The sugary drinks adversities their product to a target audience of youngsters and adolescents. The strategy encourages young to form a long-term lifestyle of buying and absorbing an amount of these drink due to being addicted to the high sugar content. By doing so, this have a wealth disadvantages to human-being’s health, they are prone to obesity and find it difficult to have a balance diet. Furthermore, sugar-based intake causes life-threatening risks such as heart disease, and even cancers.
A number of approaches can be taken to control and reduce the situation. The governments should raise taxes on the manufacture of soft drink and even its sale, the solution might be effective as people might think twice before buying a coke or a soda, for example. Another feasible measure would be to limit advertisements promoting sugar-sweetened drinks that are directly targeted at children and young people. Instead, there should be more programs to raise public awareness towards health.
In conclusion, the addition caused by some properties in sugary beverages and appealing advertisements on mass media are the primary reasons why more and more people are consuming such products. Despite this, there various actions that can be taken to encourage people avoid drinking sugary drinks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Food products labels should contain details information about that food To what extent do agree or disagree with this opinion What might be the most important information for food labels 84
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 82
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ary drinks consumption in recent years. the high additive ingredients in these beve...
^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge people avoid drinking sugary drinks.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39877300613 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93269501721 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9822272954 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418516458965 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119519128129 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675787408063 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25939440179 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054966570372 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.