The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
The table compares the changing of values from diverse commodities that were exported to different parts of the world in terms of the years of 2009 and 2010.
Generally, there was a slightly growth with regard to the figures of equipment, telecommunity, and metals in the market of exporting. By contrast, clothing and manufacturing witnessed downward trend in the given period.
In begin with 2009, metals had a modest figure in comparison with other goods with only 2.3 billion. However, its export value experienced a twofold rise in the next year up to 5.1 billion. Besides, tele-community and equipment also showed a similar trend to the first one but the amount of those were much less noticeable by 1.3 and 4 billion in orderly. In addition, tele-community gradually replace the dominant role of equipment with an overwhelming figure. When it comes to both clothing and manufacturing, those witnessed the opposite movement to the items mentioned above, whose downward trend was relative with 5 and 4 billion respectively.
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 89
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 85
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...f 2009 and 2010. Generally, there was a slightly growth with regard to the figures of equipment...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18562874251 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02806976425 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9824175814 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15064199632 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624269900641 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095347777706 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1231684849 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12384262134 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.