People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less?
The high consumption of sugary drinks is controversial in recent years when more and more people highly abuse and it results in several negative impacts. I am going to discuss its causes and suggest solutions to this issue.
In terms of the main reason why sugar-based drinks become more popular around the world, their addictive ingredients are responsible for this problem. One of the apparent facts that there are no many people understanding is the addictive property of sugar. This substance gives people a delicious sense, makes them feel conscious and boost their energy. In addition, beverage companies advertise their products like a trendy drink. Many younger experience it frequently in order to express their personality and follow their friend’s choices.
Due to harmful impacts on public health, there are some talk-shows with the participation of experts and doctors to advise and recommend these drawbacks. Despite this, people tend to ignore and the consumption of sugary drinks is continue jumping. In several countries, the government applies a high tax on this product to elevate the sale prices. This policy not only limits the number of company manufacturing sugar-based drinks, but also drops consumer’s demand. Another effective solution is controlling the content of these advertising and schedule of broadcasting how to reduce the number of children and younger watching it.
In conclusion, some ingredient in sugary drinks and these advertising are the main reasons for this phenomenon. A number of approaches are taken in many countries to solve this problem and exerts several positive effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 73
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives But few people achieve it What are the causes of problems How to overcome it 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ne of the apparent facts that there are no many people understanding is the addict...
^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity and follow their friend’s choices. Due to harmful impacts on public health,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...and the consumption of sugary drinks is continue jumping. In several countries, the gove...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advertising' or 'these advertisings'?
Suggestion: this advertising; these advertisings
... solution is controlling the content of these advertising and schedule of broadcasting how to red...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42913385827 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85946321065 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5993613458 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246266660521 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787023203868 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741928193561 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147879019624 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663683155128 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.