People are having more and more sugar-based drinks.
What are the reasons?
What are the solutions to make people drink less.
In the modern society, the consumption of sugary drinks is substantially increasing and some people even have them on a daily basis. Two reasons which are responsible for this upward trend as well as some ways which individual can take into consideration to cut down on the amount of soft drinks consumed.
As sugar-based beverages such as coke and soda are regarded to boost energy, metal alertness, and maintain high concentration, it is predominantly consumed by most of the office or factory workers. Nowadays workers tend to have more and heavier workload than in the past. They are required to have a sufficient amount of energy and mental power to complete all those demanding tasks. Hence, this makes soft drinks indispensable to them.
Another worth-mentioning culprit lies in social etiquette. As the matter of fact, sugary beverages are always served in parties, and hosts often welcome their guest either with them or alcohol drinks. It is considered impolite if a person rejects such invitation. Hence, they have no choice but to have one or few glasses of soft drinks, and as more parties of different purposes are catered nowadays, more of such beverages are consumed.
However, there are several ways which help individuals to curb their use of sugar-based drinks. Looking for the consequences of over-consumption of beverages with sweeteners is an ideal way to raise people's awareness and pose fright into them. This makes them proactively come up with different ways to avoid drinking too much of them. As completely getting rid of such drinks at once is considered impossible, gradually cutting down on the sugar level in their drinks or their amount consumed per day is also an effective method.
In conclusion, although people may find themselves consuming more and more soft beverages due to so many reasons, there are methods available to help them balance such amount. However, I believe that unless they are patient and have a strong will of staying healthy, it is very difficult for them to start getting out of the charming trap of sugary drinks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods others argue that customers should avoid buying with a lot of packaging discuss both views and give your own opinions 56
- Some people think that the qualities of a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08163265306 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82821074536 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574344023324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6423143598 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245445539978 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751039447595 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551885470344 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135540505448 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265482292772 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.