People in many countries are spending less time with their families. What are the reasons and effects of this?
Citizens in many nations are currently devoting less amount of time to family gatherings. This essay will pen down the causes and aftereffects of this phenomenon.
In terms of the running reasons behind this trend, the hectic pace of life and the addiction to social networking sites are the decisive factors. As for residing in a time when productivity and efficiency of work are of the top priority, a majority of employees have no choice but to channel all their spare time and efforts into meeting the deadlines of their tasks. Otherwise, they would be fired and there would be an overwhelming burden on their financial ability, even making them unable to afford the living expenses. Besides, some individuals are becoming highly addicted to social networking sites that they are stuck in the virtual world and suffer from a sense of social alienation. This could be derived from recent research conducted by the Ministry of Labour in Vietnam, which indicated that among frequent users of social networking sites, 27% of them spend more than half of their free time on these apps. Consequently, the amount of time for reunions with their families would be curbed considerably.
Admittedly, this phenomenon would pose dire and pending threats to the family relationships and the mental well-being of individuals. This is mainly attributed to the fact that, if workers practically focus on their occupation and neglect their beloved, the family bond will be loosened to a certain extent, or in worse cases, leading to more repercussions, such as divorces or domestic violence. For instance, a survey carried out by Homeee, a well-known page about family in Vietnam, pointed out that roughly 12% of divorces are because one spouse does not pay enough time and attention to his or her family members, thus adversely affecting the family bond. Furthermore, spending most of the time on social networking sites would take a toll on users’ mental health as they may lack direct interactions with people in real life and sink into the virtual world with unsustainable online relationships. Therefore, these people might be prone to depression and stress once their virtual relationships break up.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that the fact that people in many regions are spending less time with their families, which results from their busy life and the proliferation of networking databases, exerts adverse impacts on the family bond and individuals’ mental health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-04 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Nguyễn Văn Việt | 92 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | remienn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | hanhkatori2402 | 78 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that governments should do more to make their citizens eat a healthy diet Others however believe that individuals must take responsibility for their own diet and health Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and aftereffects of this phenomenon. In terms of the running reasons behind t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...families would be curbed considerably. Admittedly, this phenomenon would pose d...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their virtual relationships break up. In conclusion, as for the aforementioned...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y bond and individuals’ mental health.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21481481481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86940140289 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56049382716 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9477377921 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.857142857 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343122747966 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117097326471 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707609402261 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23011722676 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352067591655 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.