It is widely acknowledged that insufficient time with family is a prevalent problem in this day and age. This seems to stem from the fact that people take up a great deal of work and become overreliant on technology. Also, the potential results of this are that family connection is hurt and social welfare is negatively affected.
There are some justifiable reasons why this issue is spreading out. First and foremost, the amount of work is unceasingly mounting up regardless of any job and people have little time for family. To keep up with the inexorably required standards of living such as taxation and education, people appear to be reluctant to assume a high volume of work. This forms a barrier between members of the family. For example, research conducted in Japan shows that Japanese white collars have to spend up to 14 hours working in earnest and it seems that they nearly lack informal conversations with their families. Moreover, over-dependence on technology can also lead to inadequate time with families. In this modern society, immeasurable youngsters prioritize chatting online with their friends over confiding in their parents, which creates an emotional boundary in families.
I would contend that there are some dire consequences that take a heavy toll not only on the family but also on society. To begin with, little time for hanging out with family might bring about a considerable distance between parts of the family, which can be conducive to misunderstandings, conflicts or even breakups. Last but not least, the phenomenon may have serious repercussions on society, raising social evils. It is understandable that people those who overuse the Internet detest talking to parents and then, people gradually cannot control their behaviors. Consequently, they get engaged in social maladies such as crime and violence. This is a testament to reduced social welfare due to the absence of family time.
To sum up, lacking time for a family originating from onerous work and excessive use of technology can result in a family's long distance and deteriorated social welfare.
- whether or not someone achieves their aim is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 92
- Nowadays tourism has developed and contributed a significant portion of national income to its own country Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this development and give your own opinion 91
- Benefits of travelling 100
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the governments responsibility Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19941348974 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91324731453 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58357771261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9893821728 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.294117647 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297376184566 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909837154251 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496458707562 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178204107554 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490686044591 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.