people move to different places several times during their life. Causes? Is this a negative or positive development?
Individuals change their settlement a couple of times in their life. Employment opportunities and higher living standards could be attributable to this phenomenon. This trend has both merits and risks which will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, a wide range of jobs available in either metropolitan areas or developed countries which could act as a catalyst for national and international migration of people. This is deeply rooted in the fact that lack of human resources in these regions or nations could result in better job prospects and higher salary for workers. To illustrate, Vietnamese employees are flocking to Japan or Korea in order to seek labour-intensive jobs which is more well-paid in their homeland. In addition, people who have lucrative income tend to look for settlement which are fulfilled with necessary amenities and public services. Thus, their well-being and their dependents would be secured.
Conversely, there are unarguable pitfalls associated with the movement of individuals include loss of skillful workforce and overpopulation of certain places and nations. The first rationale is that high mobility of inhabitant could lead to brain drain of their hometown or motherland which means that professionals and the elite could change their living places for better job offers or education for their children. Given the shortage of quality workers, these places could witness the decrease in terms of productivity and national output. Besides, Given the high density of people to certain areas that would cause extreme burden on the local infrastructure. Finally, it is common that the differences in cultural, religious, and educational background of new inhabitants and the local people could cause unavoidable conflicts and have negative impacts on societies.
In the light of these facts, many disadvantages on new living places could be attributed to the trend, albeit immigrants could be highly benefits. I believe that constant changing one’s living locations would have more disadvantages than benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- Many people depend on their cars for everyday domestic social and working needs However unlimited use of cars causes a number of problems What are some of these problems What can be done to reduce the use of cars 84
- people move to different places several times during their life Causes Is this a negative or positive development 84
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same Some people consider this to be a positive development while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, finally, first, if, look, so, thus, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52063492063 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99562795555 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1726489445 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.933333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187983317702 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062840238252 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529345252298 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109394341849 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605108430463 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.