People Often Do Not Interact With Their Neighbours And This Is Harming Communities
The previous century witnessed significant growth in the human population. However, despite the increasing number of people, they avoid personal communications and do not know the names of the people next door. Many social and technological developments have caused this trend and, in my essay, I will cover two of them and propose possible ways to encourage neighbours to communicate with each other.
To begin with, people change their place of living more frequently than they did in the past. Today, many people, especially the young generation, tend to move from one town to another in pursuit of/in search of education or better job opportunities. As a result, they do not have enough time to build a relationship with people living around. Students studying overseas are a good example of this. They spend a few years in a certain place and then return to their hometown or relocate to a bigger city where they can find a better job.
International students usually are not able to build a strong connection with locals and have a solitary lifestyle. Secondly, some prefer to avoid any personal physical contact and spend more time on social media or the phone chatting with friends. Unfortunately, more people have over two hundred friends on Facebook and still, they do not have an idea about who lives in the next apartment.
There is no single strategy that we can use to make people talk to their neighbors and only a multilevel approach can change the situation. Firstly, the government should support local community events. Small festivals attract families and young people and allow them to connect with members of the community. For instance, in Auckland, every suburb has a cultural festival where the public not only learn about different cultures and try international food but also has a chance to get acquainted with their neighbors. Secondly, locals should organize community groups that can support new arrivals, have regular meetings and activities such as art or foreign language classes. Lastly and more importantly, every individual should demonstrate curiosity about people living around and be more friendly to neighbors. For example, we can start saying “good morning” to each person we meet on the way to our work.
In conclusion, frequent relocations of people and the high usage of the internet are real obstacles to develop contacts with people around. However, with government and community support and a personal will to interact with neighbors, we can break these communication barriers and build meaningful relations with our neighbors
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-18 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | Maju Chowdhury | 82 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | harmankaur1203 | 73 | view |
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the compa 67
- People Often Do Not Interact With Their Neighbours And This Is Harming Communities 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...d a better job. International students usually are not able to build a strong connection w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18899521531 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78163008797 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574162679426 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6015701667 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.45 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270852967263 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746263226131 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520471668065 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148827957259 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450941629131 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.