People receive plenty of information from news reports presented by journalists. However, some people claim that we cannot believe the news that is presented to us. What is your opinion on the issue? What qualities do you think joirnalists should have?
We are living in the period of data where individuals get the data they need by different methods, for example, radio, TV and obviously the Internet.
A few people guarantee that it is important to consider the wellspring of the data first when concluding whether to accept the news, in light of the fact that specific news associations today have gained notoriety for not introducing the news equitably, while some others are heavily influenced by the public authority or certain associations that try to control the media.
Some others believe that a more significant however troublesome thing that can beneficiaries of data these days need to do is isolated realities from suppositions, which implies the need to be basic perusers or crowds. This is just on the grounds that during a time where different advancements and methods are accessible to pretty much every person, some news suppliers may tailor realities with cameras or some PC programming to cater fot the hunger of more watchers to augment benefits, which will misdirect the popular's assessment and disposition.
Columnists, as the fundamental suppliers of the news and data, ought to be all the more sensibly level headed, restrained and decided for the guiding principle of their calling and the trust of the overall population. They are relied upon to make more news reports to reflect happenings from varying backgrounds with however many points of view as could be allowed in order to help individuals to remember what is new with their lives and obviously to push and screen governments to deal with the recently discovered issues appropriately and in no time.
In conclusion, for the most part, I figure individuals ought to be more cautious and reproachful of the news introduced by the media, since a lot of data we get today isn't unbiased and unprejudiced enough, and columnists should put in more effort to satisfy the expectation of people in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-01 | DIEU PHUONG | 78 | view |
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888 By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use To what ex 79
- Many people believe that the increasing use of modern technology at work and in leisure is reducing people s creativity To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- People receive plenty of information from news reports presented by journalists However some people claim that we cannot believe the news that is presented to us What is your opinion on the issue What qualities do you think joirnalists should have 78
- Task 2 Some people think that organizing international sports events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'populars'' or 'popular's'?
Suggestion: populars'; popular's
...ment benefits, which will misdirect the populars assessment and disposition. Columnis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'reports reflecting'.
Suggestion: reports reflecting
... They are relied upon to make more news reports to reflect happenings from varying backgrounds wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...media, since a lot of data we get today isnt unbiased and unprejudiced enough, and c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09404388715 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88849658227 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579937304075 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 20.2975951904 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9636646677 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 232.142857143 106.682146367 218% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.5714285714 20.7667163134 219% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177055578192 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750892059628 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382800185584 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882647206971 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387148124713 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 13.0946893788 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.3001002004 184% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.13 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.1190380762 198% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.