People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effects does it have on an individual and society?
Nowadays, there are a number of surveys to prove that the sleeping time of modern people is less than the ancient over many countries. This essay will discuss the reason to cause the above phenomenon and express the influences on personal and society independently.
To begin with, the reason of the reducing sleeping time is the improvement of technology. Compared with the past, there are several innovations for entertaining, such as smart television, social media and electronic games. These are attractive for us as we enjoy playing with friends as well as having a relaxing conversation with family. The interesting activities may take our interest to sleep on the bed indirectly and someone would prefer to spend the valuable sleeping time for other purposes, like upgrading the levels on the visual game. Thus, the development of technic may be the main reason of the circumstance of the less sleeping.
The lack of sleeping is possible to cause some serious influences. As for the individual, it would make a poor health, since sleeping is a necessary part to refresh our inner organs. If our rest time is not enough, the metabolism will be damaged. Likewise, maintaining an adequate rest time is important to hold a good social friendship. Because the emotion of each person is controlled by our spirit status. So, as soon as we absorb tried, anger may be easy to produce and it will destroy the relationship with others. Hence, the worse effects would be produced by the lack of sleeping hours.
In conclusion, the accelerated development of technology attracts people to reduce the time to sleep, and it may affect a poor result for the personal and society also.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | cocococo123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | parwintalwin14 | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choice on everyday matters (such as food, cloths and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is importa 61
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rtant to hold a good social friendship. Because the emotion of each person is controlle...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...oor result for the personal and society also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, as for, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98220640569 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82364103081 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4792007309 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215887964602 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690439350571 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809600741347 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145888011581 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645494718465 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.