People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves, their families and the society, so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?
Throughout the history of mankind, there is no doubt that working longer hours has gotten more common in society since it was become a mindset of company’s employees. Nevertheless, its impact on every aspect of life not only brings much controversial debate with regard to serious thought in term of the role of worker’s benefits, but also bring many negative effects on their families and their community as a whole. Therefore, i totally agree the idea of limiting working hour.
First and foremost, it is irrefutable that working with extended hours results in the deterioration of individual’s health. The first reason to support it is that being exerted pressure of a huge amount of many tasks and concentrating on work at long hours could hold the possibility of extensive damage against one’s physical condition and mental health simultaneously. Moreover, spending more time on work could probably burn the budget of personal life. It stands to the reason that having less time to care for other relationships, people may find various issues of psychological disturbance with regard to their families, soul mates as well as their lovers. Hence, human may possibly get an isolated phenomenon, which suffers from the stress and depression.
Furthermore, this not only brought negative impacts on employees, working overtime might also cause several disadvantages to the organization. By exploiting labour resources, companies around the world can expect the higher quality in output with lower expenditure. To illustrate, we can see from thousands of people in japanese company, a place which is infamous for the term of overtime working, are constituting a suicidal thought at young age of job holders because of much superior’s pressure. Moreover, although the employers promised maximum benefit from limited resources for those who were afforded long working hours, it cannot be verified that it could not get the destructive effect in long-term. The primary’s reason is that employees tend to be less productive, and meanwhile, at great risks of sickness and absenteeism. As a result, employers have to spend much more time on recruiting and training new workers. To a country as a whole, it has chronic effects, disabling the optimisation of resource use, human capital and natural resources.
As the aforementioned drawbacks and reasons, there is obviously no reason accounting for why working expanded hours can be acceptable. In short, this would lead to frequent sick leaves and low productivity, thereby doing more harm than good to people and the corporates as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-09 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before? 73
- Do you think a museum is to educate or entertain people? 84
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity. 73
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 73
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...s as well as their lovers. Hence, human may possibly get an isolated phenomenon, which suffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...s as well as their lovers. Hence, human may possibly get an isolated phenomenon, which suffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in short, no doubt, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38199513382 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10060261865 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610705596107 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5705374476 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.117647059 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287922226284 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879072671151 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799583543486 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178377829158 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518593951254 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.