People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?

Working longer hours is getting more common in today's society. Personally, I argue that this trend not only has an adverse impact on the workers themselves but also on their families and the community as a whole. Therefore, I agree entirely with the idea of limiting working hours.
To individuals, working for more extended hours triggers at least two issues. Firstly, workers are so immersed in their jobs that they have a tendency to live a high pressured and stressful lifestyle frequently and overlook entertainment activities. This lifestyle increases the chance that they suffer from various health problems such as splitting headaches, Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, spending more time on work is probably at the cost of personal life. Busy working schedules prevent people from taking regular family trips or even just having meals together. Relationships among members are considerably weakened if they can not make time for each other. As a result, people may become socially isolated.
Long hour working staff not only put themselves at a disadvantage but also hampers the development of their companies and society sometimes. Some academic researches have pointed out that the most productive period of a person in a day is limited and it only lasts in certain hours. Therefore, employees can not pay their attention to what they are doing if they experience nonstop long working hours. In many cases, they are mistakes when they can not focus on anything lead to the shutdown of the production line and cause tremendous wastes to their company in particular and to society in general. It gives an explanation of why a lot of firms do not foster their staff to work overtime. They usually organize beneficial outdoor activities for their workers like vacation or sports events.
In conclusion, I would argue that working time should be reduced since the frequency of long working hours exerts a severe impact on employees, their families, and the community.

Votes
Average: 2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-17 TLan168 67 view
2023-03-05 giangngoc 78 view
2021-10-27 mhuong_d 78 view
2021-10-27 mhuong_d 78 view
2021-10-27 mhuong_d 78 view
Essays by user minhumm :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.165625 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73980888647 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60625 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1646139705 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2352941176 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350270825159 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109151351594 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966958363804 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235568626209 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547400163971 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.