A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people argue that people should be judged based on their wealth and status in the modern world. But it is inaccurate to say that old-fashioned values like honour, kindness, and trust are meaningless. Personally, I partly disagree with this point, as below are some reasons to support my view.
On the one hand, it is not entirely correct to claim that traditional values like honor, kindness, and trust are completely insignificant.These values are still highly regarded in many societies and are considered essential for personal and societal well-being. As a Vietnamese person, I can attest to the importance of these values in my culture, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of kindness and compassion towards others. People around the country have come together to support one another in times of crisis, demonstrating that these values are still deeply ingrained in our societies. To sum up, social status does not necessarily reflect a person’s personal worth or character in difficult times. Morals and values play an important role in our life.
On the other hand, social status and material possessions are a little bit the only factors that determine a person's worth, there are some potential benefits associated with having these things. Firstly, having a higher social status can bring a number of advantages as well as increased opportunities for yourself. Remember that like attracts like, so people with higher social status not only will have networking well but also will respect and admire other people rather than their personality. Secondly, the pursuit of social status and material possessions can motivate individuals to work hard and strive for success. This can lead to personal growth and accomplishment, as well as contribute to the economy by driving consumption and innovation.
In conclusion, it is important to remember that social status and material possessions do not define a person's worth. So, I disagree with this statement. However, we should consider different aspects of a person in order to appreciate their personal worth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative development 55
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Many major cities are facing a housing crisis as they cannot provide enough land for new buildings Some local governments believe the problem could be solved by reassigning park land for residential development because this land would be better used for h 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... and trust are completely insignificant.These values are still highly regarded in man...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es play an important role in our life. On the other hand, social status and mat...
^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...l status and material possessions are a little bit the only factors that determine a perso...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, in conclusion, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34441087613 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93936123507 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1835710802 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297344174765 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103023020826 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061734431133 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191428109131 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471659870337 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
... and trust are completely insignificant.These values are still highly regarded in man...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es play an important role in our life. On the other hand, social status and mat...
^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...l status and material possessions are a little bit the only factors that determine a perso...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, in conclusion, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34441087613 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93936123507 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1835710802 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297344174765 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103023020826 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061734431133 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191428109131 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471659870337 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.