Some people think that plastic shopping bags should be prohibited because they are one of the major pollutants of both land and water around the world. However, in my opinion, the replacement of plastic bags also carry significant environmental risk, thus, plastic bags should not be banned.
On the one hand, the reason that plastic bags should be banned in the near future is because they do not biodegrade and continue to pollute the environment for hundred of years after being discarded. An insignificant percentage of people may reuse or recycle plastic bags, but most ultimately litter or throw them in the trash. If they are thrown in the trash, plastic bags will wind up in the ever increasing number of landfills and contribute to soil pollution. The one that simply tossed in the street clog drains in the cities and eventually found their way to the sea and entangled marine life. As a result, the only way to prevent throw away plastic, such as plastic shopping bags, from seriously and irreversibly damaging our planet is to prohibit it.
On the other hand, despite the advantages of banning plastic bags, some of the alternatives are worse than the original problem. First, most people who advocate banning plastic bags suggest paper bags, which are biodegradable, or reusable bags that are typically made from cotton or plastic. Both of these replacements have flaws. For example, paper bags require us to continue clearing forests and also carry a large carbon footprint. In addition, independent studies showed that the production of cotton and reusable plastic cause more harm to the environment than disposable plastic bags. Coupled with the fact that reusable bags are more difficult to recycle, their overall effect on the environment is worse.
In conclusion, I do not think overly simplistic restrictions on plastic bags would have the desired positive effect. Rather than thoughtlessly banning them, policy makers should come up with a policy that balances the materials we use for bags in order to produce an overall positive impact on the environment.
- If a person is given a choice between life without work and working a lot he would prefer to have a life without work Do you agree or disagree 57
- Towns and cities are attractive places Some suggest the government should spend money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues to make them better to live in Do you agree or disagree 95
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, plastic bags should not be banned. On the one hand, the reason that plastic...
^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...continue to pollute the environment for hundred of years after being discarded. An insi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amaging our planet is to prohibit it. On the other hand, despite the advantage...
^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the advantages of banning plastic bags, some of the alternatives are worse than the origina...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll effect on the environment is worse. In conclusion, I do not think overly sim...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12903225806 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69753917608 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551319648094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8271638875 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315533341153 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102459404068 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733915305289 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20171447084 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581174551844 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.