Towns and cities are attractive places Some suggest the government should spend money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues to make them better to live in Do you agree or disagree

Towns and cities are attractive places. Some people suggest the government should spend money putting in more works of art like painting and statues to make them better to live in. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, thanks to the rapid development of the construction technology, metropolises are more charming that attract more citizens as well as foreign visitors. It is commonly believed that the local authority ought to allocate more funding into works of arts like galleries or sculptures. In this essay, I am going to demonstrate that there exist priorities that governments should take more considerations.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that art offers a myriad of tremendous benefits for city dwellers. First and foremost, these paintings and statues may create a sense of comfort for most employees after stressful working day. The implication of this is that admiring works of art can help staffs in hustling and bustling urban areas ameliorate working pressure; as a result, they can work efficiently. Moreover, constructing more sculptures may be beneficial regarding educating youngsters in big cities. Vietnam is typically exemplified for this situation. Thanks to heroic statues in parks in the downtown of these metropolises, young children may raise their awareness about how their ancestors fought against invaders to protect the national peace and independence.
Notwithstanding aforementioned benefits, I am of the opinion that government should pay more attention to distribute national budget into developing transportation infrastructure. It is undeniable that congestion is a pressing issue in urban areas. Therefore, spending more money into constructing and modernizing road infrastructure like overbridges or subway lines may be more beneficial compare art. Last but not least, pouring finances into facilitating medical centers is also essential issue that government must concern. This does not only make a profound contribution toward ensuring and enhancing public health but also relieve the financial burdens for local authorities regarding meager income patients’ treatments.
While some people suggest that the governments should spend more finances in constructing pieces of art, I argue that building road infrastructure and medical centers may be more essential.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (9 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66475644699 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15148994933 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604584527221 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.471744307 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.833333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415292602594 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117963548361 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144382128302 0.0667982634062 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283770294993 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.264399144827 0.056905535591 465% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.