Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think it should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?
In regard of the adverse effects plastic wastes have caused on the environment, there are those who hold the belief that plastic shopping bags should not be allowed in our daily lives. From my perspective, I totally advocate this solution in order to save the alarming status of global environment and existence of natural creatures from becoming destroyed.
First and foremost, it is obvious that plastic bags is a considerable threat to the natural environment. As you know, plastic is a non-biodegradable substance, which means that it takes several thousand years just to decompose a simple plastic shopping bags. Therefore, when being deeply buried into the soil, the sustainable condition of these harmful bags will prevent flora's root from growing. As a result, it cannot be denied that both soil pollution and evenly erosion are certainly unavoidable.
Besides, plastic wastes are considered to be a potential criminal causing a huge death of varied animals. In clarification, it can be seen that fauna has supposed these plastic bags to be their food without having any awareness of their terrible injury. For instance, aquatic species have been cheated by jellyfish-like appearances of plastic bags and ingest them. As a consequence, this results in dreadful diseases to the marine life.
Last but not least, plastic bags are harmful to human health. To be clarified, they contain a variety of contaminated substances. Thus, the more foods or other things we store in a plastic bag, the more risks we take to be suffered from serious health problem such as: kidney cancer, obedient and so on.
In conclusion, it in undeniable that plastic bags have badly affected on not only the environmental aspect but also the global animal lives. Hence, I myself strongly agree with the statement that the government should prohibit the usage of plastic bags as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-02 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 61 | view |
- Influence of human beings on the world’s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity. What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 84
- These days many families move to other countries for work. Some people believe that the children in these families benefit from this move. However, others believe that it makes life more difficult for the children.Discuss both these views and give your ow 73
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, you know, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18300653595 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84758873214 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9376096008 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254202431385 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829359706186 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473227855418 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140210402975 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220660884625 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.