Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think they should be banned.
Do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether plastic shopping bags should be prohibited because of its negative environmental impacts or not is vigorously discussed. From my perspective, the ban on this kind of bag should not be approved due to some main reasons following.
To commence with, plastic bags are cheaper and safer for users' health in certain cases when compared to other types of shopping bags like bags made of paper or canvas materials. When humans do large shopping grocery trips, they will need more shopping bags than usual which may result in their additional financial strain. Moreover, almost all the reusable shopping bags tested are jam-packed with bacteria. Thus, plastic bags seem to be more appropriate to carry raw foods such as fish and meat which can spread bacteria that possibly lead to fatal food poisoning.
Secondly, contrary to popular belief, some other kinds of shopping bags like tote bags or paper bags even can cause more serious soil and ocean pollution. This is because the production of these bags requires a greater quantity of wood, water, energy, and chemical substances. The utilization of these components will induce a lack of natural resources, and after toxic substances discharged into the land and sea, they will also worsen the environmental situation. Furthermore, if users just take advantage of these bags a few times, they will still produce a huge amount of waste which needs such a long period to degrade.
In conclusion, there should not be any proscription of plastic grocery bags because of their advantages and disadvantages that the ban on them can bring to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-26 | chlwkgus | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-17 | dhpt12082003 | 78 | view |
- the diagram shows how an office building looks at the present and the plan for its future development 73
- Nowadays media should include more good news in their publications Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 73
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and the plans also give a description of the proposed changes in future 73
- the graph below shows the amount of tea and coffee imported by four different countries 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09022556391 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69138276427 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7690837465 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309671733036 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117797648687 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511969297254 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195884622663 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401680475763 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.