The population of young people is more than old people in the countries. And it benefits us To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the number of young adults is much higher than that of the elderly in particular nations. In my opinion, this phenomenon can be beneficial for both governments and individuals.
Granted, countries having a host of young people could have a well-educated workforce. The reason for this is that adults or graduates tend to work hard or put a lot of effort in improving their expertise in order to land a high-paid job in a competitive work market. Furthermore, it is more reasonable for authorities to invest in the young generation than in older workers who receive their pensions without contributing anything. For example, policymakers could provide high school students with scholarships to study abroad, or they could employ a free-college policy. This would result in a rise in the opportunities to pursue higher education for young people, leading to high-performance workplaces. Therefore, by having an increasing number of young residents and investing in these citizens, political leaders can give a rise to their thriving economy or their GDP rate.
Governments could also save a great deal of money by having fewer old people than young people. In fact, they do not have to spend a lot of money erecting facilities for the elderly. In other words, this amount of money can be allocated to solving other problems such as air pollution which is a common issue in all countries. Additionally, a host of people, say, underprivileged children can be beneficial from this as their authorities would spend money building health and educational facilities for them instead of giving pensions to the elderly. Thus, governments can save money if the number of old people is fewer than that of younger.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that this phenomenon offers governments and humans a lot of advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-03 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Cambridge 7 test 2 task 1 78
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, in my opinion, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11371237458 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06874367245 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5949859616 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.214285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13350764108 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559163699677 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672815330453 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672617384535 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045017719304 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.