There is an opinion held by a section of the society that, fewer responsibilities in a child's life is postive development, while there are others, who think that it is not a good sign and needs attention. I find it more logical to endorse the former view, the reasons for which will be enumerated in this essay.
Firstly , one of the main reasons why some people have a negative attitude towards this trend is that, in their view, with no responsibilities children will not be a responsible citizen. In the past, children were the ones who did most of the household works, and as a result, when they grew up they were able to live a healthy citizens who contributed to the benefit of the society. Without responsibilities this would have been impossible. The Chinese billionaire Jack Ma is a shining example for this. In an interview he said that, he was the one who did all the works in his house and those responsibilities helped him to come back from his failures.
On the other hand, like the advocates of the positive development, I too believe that having fewer responsibilities to children is a positive development. This is because, children can spend more time with their family and friends when they are free from responsibilities. This will improve their interpersonal skills and will lead to the absence of problems such as bullying, delinquency and truancy in later life. For instance, a recent survey found out that, children who spent more time with their family behaved properly in the public than their counterparts. Moreover, children can concentrate more on their studies and career during these times. This will improve their academic achievement.
In conclusion, I believe that fewer responsibilities for children is a good trend because it allows them to spend more time with their loved ones and also enable them to concentrate on their studies and career
- In most parts of the world people are living longer What are the possible causes of this situation Is this a negative or positive development 73
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 78
- Some people think that Books are losing as a source of information and entertainment Do you agree or disagree 75
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch will be enumerated in this essay. Firstly , one of the main reasons why so...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...numerated in this essay. Firstly , one of the main reasons why some people...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'citizen'?
Suggestion: citizen
...rew up they were able to live a healthy citizens who contributed to the benefit of the s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... concentrate on their studies and career
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9465408805 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01171867649 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6256868088 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199549529199 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684407969379 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777610249081 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114536451561 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303719159825 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.