With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (eg: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, Many young people are pressured to succeed academically, so removing non-academic subjects can help them concentrate on academic subjects. When non-academic subjects are removed from the syllabus, students don’t have to spend time on studying non-academic subjects such as physical education, cookery, and other unnecessary subjects. In order to do that, children can use both of their time and energy to study better. Moreover, students can develop social skills and major knowledge in majors that they focus and passion. Therefore, many students have an excellent education result when they just focus on academic subjects.
In contrast, children can use less important skills to face the world and make accurate decisions. Studying non-academic subjects help students expand many software skills like interpersonal skills, problem skills, communication skills, etc. In addition, children are developing physically and emotions, so help them refresh their mind and reduce stress after studying hard. Furthermore, non-academic subjects such as passion, music, physical, cookery, social skills, etc also can help students grow up and help them become confident people in life. A case in point, many people in the world achieved success, but their work could be broken soon because of health problems or their skill, consequently they are difficult to go far away. In contrast, many old people are at retirement age, but they also have strong health to do work. That’s a result of the learning process when they were students.
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 56
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54237288136 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79443610924 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580508474576 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5321374549 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328111648321 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12084358795 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131590584927 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280187424145 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998281227913 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.