With the pressures on today's young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (eg: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, youngsters are going through high stress due to the expectations of always performing well in the academic fields. Hence, this leads to the thought that the non-academic subjects should be abolished from the curriculum to leave more room for those academic ones so that students can put their whole heart to achieve the best score in academics. However, I personally hold the opposite opinion over this viewpoint for several reasons.
Firstly, the vocational subjects provide opportunities for children to acquire and enhance essential skills which are proved to be necessary for their comprehensive development. For instance, through physical education, not only can youngsters improve both their physical and mental health but they can also gain practical skills such as communication, teamwork, and decision-making. These life skills, obviously, are not taught in those academic subjects.
Secondly, while every child is gifted with a special talent, not many of them can truly recognize it. Therefore, engaging in extra-curricular activities is a chance for students to bring out their hidden talents to the limelight and give wings to it. After all, one of the primary goals of education is to help students discover their true interests and encourage them to pursue it. In fact, many singers, athletes, and artists recognized their abilities and passions in non-academic fields from an early age and then later achieved great success in their career.
In conclusion, I believe that non-academic subjects are as crucial as academic ones for the wholesome development of an individual so there is no point in vanishing these subjects. School should provide a rounded education with a mix of academic and non-academic fields to give students the best preparation for their life in the future
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Jane jane | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Vishant jawlallia | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | ludovicag | 56 | view |
| 2016-01-05 | prepareielts2016 | 60 | view |
| 2015-04-06 | Scott | 80 | view |
- compare and contrast working from home and working at office 91
- With the pressures on today's young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (eg: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic 78
- compare and contrast working from home and working at office 93
- Many people believe that it is important to always tell the truth. In your opinion, is it ever acceptable to tell a lie?Explain your answer giving reasons and specific examples. 73
- Many people believe that it is important to always tell the truth. In your opinion, is it ever acceptable to tell a lie?Explain your answer giving reasons and specific examples. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, after all, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3838028169 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96979437591 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7207708694 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9166666667 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21734956731 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801705551879 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691443182987 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145636071482 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690740919331 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.