The professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers should be paid more than sports and entertainment stars or personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals opine that people pursuing highly qualified careers should receive higher pay than those who work in the sports and entertainment sector. I completely disagree with this viewpoint, and my reasons would be explored below.
Without doubt, people working in the medical and educational sector make a considerable contribution to society; however, it is undeniable that sports and entertaining public figures not only establish the reputation but also act as an economic catalyst for local society. Take Korea, the country is renowned for its prosperous entertainment industry as an example. When Korean idols organize international fan meetings, they can attract influxes of followers to partake in. This will drastically boost the domestic economy, namely the consumption of hotels and concert tickets.
Secondly, being an athletic or entertaining celebrity is a demanding job, and they are obliged to sacrifice a lot. Athletes normally have to abide by intensive training schedules and strict diets that almost ordinary people cannot follow. Moreover, public figures do not have their personal privacy, as they are always subject to public scrutiny. These kinds of work are as strenuous and intense as treating patients or imparting knowledge to students. Thus, they deserve to be considered as highly remunerative jobs.
My final argument is that the career span of individuals working in the sports and entertainment field is comparatively short. They generally start their career path at an early age but retire in their early middle age. In contrast, other professional workers tend to have a more guaranteed job because their retirement age is firmly imposed in governmental law. Thus, sportspeople and recreating stars are entitled to be highly paid, which will help them ensure an adequate life after their retirement.
In conclusion, I would argue that athletes and entertainment celebrities equally deserve an equivalent payment compared to other professionals working in the medical and educational field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | lauranguyen_97 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution in these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now. Some say that news has no connection with most people's life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news p 84
- Some people take temporary jobs, for they have time to do other things. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Many people think it is very important to protect the environment but they make no effort to do it themselves. Why does it happen? What actions should individuals take to protect the environment? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59677419355 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99405585243 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6281166959 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145991172235 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432110931815 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354053267561 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788503016777 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036906905699 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.