Public transportation is a great way to travel, particularly within a metropolis. The Shanghai metro is the most convenient way to get around the city. Do you agree or disagree?
Public transport is the best option to ease the traffic conjunction in the large cities, as metro system is the most preferred in an enormous city of Shanghai. The underground trains do not depend on the vehicle movement outside, therefore, in my perspective, it is undeniably, if it is not, one of the best, alternatives to get around the city.
To begin with, travelling by subway has some drawbacks as well as myriad number of benefits. Firstly, it is not a secret that terroristic attacks in purpose of eliminating peaceful citizens were planned and acted, and not once. So it seems to be a risk that can outcome with devastating consequences for anyone, anywhere and anytime. Secondly, getting around the city by public metro may be exhausting, since sometimes in rush hours young adults have to travel for a long distances on a standing position. Therefore, public transportation is not always better choice, as private vehicles look more convenient.
On the other side, there are some crucial advantages that metro system provides for consumers such as travelling without any hindrances. These days, governments are more aware of their biggest liability- security of living, thus, police officers are observing in most of the train stations. Also, the issue of traffic jam has not gone anywhere and in cosmopolitans the vehicles become less desired by townsfolk, due to the chance to get somewhere in developing metro trains without stress even in rush hours. The fact that underground trains are driven on electricity, it makes them eco-friendly way of transport, what can not be spoken about other vehicles
In conclusion, there is no doubt that own transport ensure the flexibility in travel, but public metro allow the commuters to travel without any obstacle. So, governments should implement even better service for citizens.
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. 78
- Holidays honor people or events. If you could create a new holiday, what person or event would it honor and how would you want people to celebrate it? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 78
- In many parts of the world there is continuous coverage of sport on television. Some people believe this discourages the young from taking part in any sport themselves.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., alternatives to get around the city. To begin with, travelling by subway has ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...private vehicles look more convenient. On the other side, there are some crucia...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can not be spoken about other vehicles In conclusion, there is no doubt that ow...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16053511706 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89856401678 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0785233036 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222379061156 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664211651542 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574157543965 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130556789312 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348716570073 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.