The qualities a person needs to become truly successful cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, it is widely perceived that an individual could achieve a fruitful career without going through any forms of education. Personally, I thoroughly disagree with this position.
There are numerous reasons why enrolling in university could contribute to learners’ success, one of which is a range of soft and hard skills it provides. Should students be required to finish group assignments such as presentations, they will have to organize their learning sections more properly as well as learn to work with friends to achieve decent academic results. This would therefore facilitate their time management and cooperative skills, which might contribute to their prospects of success. Another justification for positive impacts of tertiary education is the professional equivalent for various working fields. That those qualifications remain a prerequisite for occupations including doctors, lawyers or teachers is undeniable. These types of jobs are highly-required in a sound foundation of knowledge, thereby owning a third-level degree could enhance students’ employability.
The demerits of the overlook of post-secondary education, however, are indisputable. First and foremost, social relations is what a non-graduate is most likely to lack. Students entering universities could promote their future partnership through their colleges, teachers or lecturers. Meanwhile, the circle of friends of individuals quitting higher education seems to be limited, which would in turn create an obstacle to further promotion in their career paths. It should also be noted that the graduate would deal with the dearth of expertise. When they are not well-experienced enough to pursue their ideal occupations, they could be wrongly oriented towards unsound directions and vague plans, which leaves a lower chance for them to flourish at work later.
In sum, for the reasons mentioned above, I would contend that tertiary education plays a vital role in students’ prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-02 | keidashi | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | tamnguyen89 | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | buithuha2981998 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity. The demerits of the overlook of post-secondary education, however, are i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, third, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77966101695 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18249665759 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650847457627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.540994963 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881030362384 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026756973881 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266407354453 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421157370604 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312059632491 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.