Some people think that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today’s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a widely held belief that higher education fails to equip its graduates with attributes that would drive them towards success in the modern world. I am strongly convinced that while attending academic institutions is one gateway to future success, exposure to real-life situations should play a complementary role.
On the one hand, I accept that higher education can offer a favorable environment for valuable qualities to be developed. It is an irrefutable fact that students upon enrolling in university courses are likely provided with ample opportunities to expand their expertise in a particular area of interest. In a competitive world of job, a degree anchored in a specific field might be indicative of a candidate’s academic competency and job potential, thus making the applicants more marketable in the eye of the recruiters. Also, a stockpile of transferable skills necessary for future occupations can be built within higher education settings. Regular group projects or participation in case studies, for instance, can help prospective graduates hone their teamwork and critical thinking skills, which are considered essentials for future jobs.
On the other hand, I also believe that university qualifications alone are not sufficient in raising one’s chances of career prospects. First of all, individuals are more likely to be successful when they know how to apply their knowledge in authentic contexts. While theoretical underpinnings play a central role, it is of paramount importance that they be accompanied by practice. In addition, by engaging in real-world challenges, graduates are offered a golden opportunity to cultivate a repertoire of skills that they may not be able to harness while attending school. Skills including but not limited to communication, problem-solving, discernment and creativity acquired from real working environments may act as instrumental factors in determining one’s ability to climb the corporate ladder in the future.
In conclusion, I hold a firm belief that a combination of higher education and exposure to real-life tasks is pivotal to develop qualities that are deemed essential for professional excellence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | phamkhuyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | phamkhuyen | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | giangngoc | 84 | view |
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and is it positive or negative development 86
- Some people think that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- As a part of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Young people are now spending more and more time and money following fashion trends What is your opinion Is this a positive or negative development 92
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and is it positive or negative development 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... considered essentials for future jobs. On the other hand, I also believe that u...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61746987952 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2961813749 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617469879518 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3807089409 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.461538462 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113999367701 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394929742883 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0208440291728 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648397033308 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251989223588 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.