Question: Some people think that coins and paper money will vanish in a few years. We will only use plastic cards or some other form of electronic currency. Is this a positive or negative development?
Everywhere in the world, some people use paper money while others use credit cards or bitcoins. With that in mind, people argue that using electrical currency instead of paper is a good invention or bad. As the electrical currency is considered the future, it has more positive than negatives such as it can be easily carried and can be used for purchases around the globe.
First of all, taking care of paper money is a difficult task that people try to avoid. Although some people have the habit to carry some money with them, it is considered unsafe. As people tend to forget things easily, they can forget their wallets in different places. As it is unsafe, it carries weight. Since it is considered heavy, people do not like it when they have too many things with them when they are going somewhere.
On the other hand, the electrical currency carries more applications than paper money. It is safe to say that it can be used for transactions all over the world. Although there are many scammers, yet electrical currency is considered the best solution towards buying anything online. Besides, being used for buying thing all over the world it is also considered as the safest route of buying anything. Millions of transactions are done all over the world every day can be used to say it carries the weight of showing the positive aspects of the electrical currency.
In conclusion, both forms of paper currency and electrical currency are used by people all over the world. But in the near future, the electrical currency will take over paper currency.
- Some people say that science study should be mandatory in schools others argue that it is unnecessary Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Employment rates 73
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land 87
- Some people believe money is a less important factor than free time for quality of life What other factors are necessary to live a good quality of lifestyle 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79259259259 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46969006125 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6036126151 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229984738819 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924104397762 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782146233903 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161792359725 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649391652498 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.