The range of technology available to people is increasing the pay between the rich and the poor. Others thick it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether the gap between the rich and the poor is being increased by modern technology or not. Although the range of available techniques are disadvantageous in some cases, I am of the opinion that it is closing the gap for most circumstances.
On the one hand, technological development has an opposite effect on individuals particularly in developing nations. First of all, plenty of manual work including cleaning, serving, washing, … that are originally responsible by humans will be replaced by robots after a few years. This is because using automatic machines reduces the employment cost, time and narrow errors made by people, which can increase the level of unemployment in the society. The second reason is that modern technology is not common in specific regions around the world like Africa and developing countries. In other words, it is hard for the poor to receive the newest technology and find solutions to escape from their poor situations, while the rich earn a huge amount of money from technological projects.
Innovative technology, on the other hand, is decreasing the separation between the rich humans and the poor ones, related to education and career path. With regard to the former, electronic personal assistants such as smartphones, laptops which are connected to the internet can provide many correspondence courses for poor children. If they are patient and studious enough, as a result they will gain knowledge and skills to earn money for a living. In addition, workers can find opportunities that have higher salaries and benefits by using the applications on their phones. For example, if Vietnamese students attend training sessions online related to IT skills, they could find a wide range of high paying jobs in this major, which will help them become rich in the future.
In conclusion, although it can be denied that the range of modern technology has an adverse effect on the pay between the poor and the rich, I believe that it will decrease the gap for most cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | vttphuong.d19 | 78 | view |
- Some people think it is more important for the government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Although more and more people read news on the internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news Do you agree or disagree 61
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the pay between the rich and the poor Others thick it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, in some cases, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10447761194 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85347841257 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564179104478 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.4573064673 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1538461538 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260948932148 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889278709557 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829821136561 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179194398427 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587528789628 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.