In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books.
Do the advantages outweight the disadvantages?
Over the last centuries technological development has spread to almost all the areas of life, from science to entertainment. Nowadays the number of individuals preferred e-books instead of paper versions is constantly growing. This essay will examine the main benefits and drawbacks of this trend and provide logical argumentation of the merits` prevalence.
On the one hand, the probable disadvantages of electronic versions increasing popularity are less comprehensive understanding of literature work as well as the limited ability to share the book with others. Not only is the meaning of the novel important, but also the décor, cover and font are considerable. For instance, overwhelming majority of children books are designed with paintings and unusual font, however, only paper versions can give the readers an opportunity to enjoy all of these elements. Furthermore, paper books can be easily presented or given to friends or mates for a while, while e-books can be read only by the person who bought them. Thus, the drawbacks of electronic literature are believed to be difficulties with sharing the books along with less complete perception of the novel.
On the other hand, the principal advantages of this tendency are ecological benefits and a possibility to read more. If people choose e-books, less trees, which are needed for paper production, will be cut. For instance, according to the survey conducted by the Siberian Ecological Society, the level of deforestation has been declined over the last decades due to the usage of the electronic documents. Moreover, digital versions of novels and poetries can be read on smartphones, e-books and laptops. Therefore, humans can read more due to the lack of necessity to take paper books, which are sometimes rather heavy, and use their phones for reading. Hence, the main benefits of digital literature are less harmful effects on environment as well as the convenience to read.
I am convinced that the advantages of e-books dominate over disadvantages due to the significant contribution of ecological influence into the lives of people all over the world. Basically, deforestation may lead to the deterioration of the air quality, and, consequently, to the lungs diseases. It cannot be denied, that health problems prevail over the desire to enjoy paper books.
To conclude, I strongly believe the main merits of digital literature, which are considered to be environment preservation and convenient reading, outweight the demerits, such as comprehensive perception and a chance to give a book to others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
- It is often claimed that electronic devices will soon replace paper books Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local businesses are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local businesses will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agr 89
- Email is a fast and convenient way to communicate and written letters aren t needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 57
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 95
- Health education is an essential aspect of community health Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...to read more. If people choose e-books, less trees, which are needed for paper produ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36699507389 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10862907156 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8931432537 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.055555556 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252827308277 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719665537386 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566993784296 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121305263691 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542359435 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.