In recent years, the number of visitors of art galleries are decreasing steadily.
What are the reasons for this trend?
What can be done to improve the number of visitors.
It is true that nowadays fewer and fewer people visit art galleries. It seems to me that there are several triggers might cause this and steps taken by both government and institution which organize to encourage some visitors.
The primary reason why people have less interested in art galleries is that, perhaps, people tend to get bored when they visit the place, since the gallery has lack of innovation to show the arts. Moreover, due to the advanced of technology, people are more preferable to visit some temporary buildings which provide the technology attraction, like Theme Park. Another reason is that, people prefer to staying at home instead of visiting art gallery, as the location is far away from their home. Therefore, inspite of giving a lot of efforts to reach the location, they also have to spend much money on transport costs to commute from their home and to the gallery.
It appeals to me there are several steps which could be taken by government and the art gallery’s staffs to spur the visitiors’ interest. In term of government’s support, the authorities could give some incentive funds in order to buy technology-powered tools, so that it could attract not only youngsters who are passionate about the advanced technology, but also foreign tourists. Moreover, by using the technological advancement, the staffs could utilize it to make the exhibiton more and more reachable for those who live far away from the gallery, for example, showing the attraction on the internet and social media. Lastly, of course, the effective advertisement done by the staffs could encourage people’s interest to visit the gallery.
To sum up, it can be said the reasons why the level of art gallery visitors has decreased recently are caused by the outdated exhibition shown by the art staffs, the advanced technology, and the location far away from people’s home. This, however, could be overcome by aid funds given by government, using technology, and well-prepared advertisement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 84
- Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- the graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- In recent years, the number of visitors of art galleries are decreasing steadily.What are the reasons for this trend?What can be done to improve the number of visitors. 67
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch organize to encourage some visitors. The primary reason why people have less ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stay'?
Suggestion: stay
...nother reason is that, people prefer to staying at home instead of visiting art gallery...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, of course, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22324159021 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99935308359 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544342507645 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6305255743 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136620020499 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522657603652 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534406858654 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939961613998 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598939703554 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.