In recent years, the pressure of students in university is increasing and they are pushed to work hard from a young age. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, students have to suffer from many pressures from schools and universities. In my opinion, I believe that this is a positive trend since students can make use of their best time to study and enjoy greater career opportunities.
To begin with, students can clearly take advantage of their youth. While brain of adults is rigid, brain of children is still developing and can easily absorb knowledge at an unparalleled rate. Take myself as an example, when I was 5, my father sent me to the Chinese classes for 20 hours per week. I effortlessly memorized new words and imitated the native accent. By the age of 8, my Chinese level was already at C1. In contrast, when starting learning English in university, it took me 3 years to simply reach a B1 level. As such, children should not miss this window of opportunity when knowledge acquisition is still at the best to study hard.
And furthermore, studying hard can prepare for students’ future career. Students who spend great efforts on studying to get excellent grades are able to make themselves more attractive to employers. As a personal example, during 4 years of university, I always studied hard for good grades. Near my graduation day, many companies came to my university to look for potential candidates. They were attracted when they saw my top-ranked GPA and as a result, I received an offer from a reputed multinational firm. My personal story illustrates that a strong work ethic can open doors to many opportunities.
To sum up, for the reasons mentioned above, I think that students should utilize their young age to acquire as much knowledge as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-17 | nguyen duc | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | nguyen duc | 61 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The diagrams be low show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 67
- The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK in 2009
- Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden
- school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, so, still, while, i think, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94223826715 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8932580055 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3952550636 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5625 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160219196426 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048987669712 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043273364191 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104809348893 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361798906099 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.