In recent years, tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit. However, some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that more and more tourists have been conscious of cultural and environmental aspects of the countries they visit. Many individuals, however, hold the view that it is impracticable for those travellers to bear responsibility for these aspects. In my opinion, while I agree that attention has been paid to both culture and environment by tourists themselves, I refute the ladder idea that it is infeasible for them to have responsible manners.
It stands to reason that a large number of holiday-makers have been aware of the culture and environment issues of the host nations. In the last decades, tourists used to spark hostility to the locals, in where they visit, seeing that they did litter the street and break the traditional rules and regulations, which are the time-honored traditions of the host countries. But, this is no longer the case in this day and age when individuals are being raised consciousness of the norms and practices of the locals. To illustrate, in Singapore, a country well-know for the hygien practices and street cleanness, visitors often cause frustration because they didnot comform to these strict rules when they pay a visit to this country. With the passing of time, they are gradually adopting the norms of this nation and learn how to protect the environment effectively and efficiently.
However, I do argue that it is a fallacy that tourists cannot be liable for their impacts on the environment and conventions of the countries they flock into. Some proponents of this point of view maintain that those temporary tourist would not adopt all the traditions and ways of protecting environment of the locals as time is limited. But, in my view, it is the matter of consciousness, not time. If, for example, holiday-makers strive to spend one to two days with instructors who excel at convenions and environment practices of the host nations, then it is more likely that they could easily adopt all these norms and practices. Consequently, they could feel more confident when roaming around these nations and even receive hospitality from all the locals there.
In conclusion, while I advocate that cultural and environmental awareness are being developed, it is not impossible for all tourist to behave responsibly with the nations they travel to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 73 | view |
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 73 | view |
- The first chart shows the population of England and Wales between 1700 and 2000 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rate in the same countried in the same period 53
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 83
- Newspapers have great influence on people’s opinions and ideas. What are the reasons of the phenomenon and analyze the positive and negative effects of the phenomenon. 67
- The diagram shows the information in the genetic engineering process. 56
- The pie charts below show 5 reasons why people chose to leave/stayed in the UK. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...le manners. It stands to reason that a large number of holiday-makers have been aware of the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pting the norms of this nation and learn how to protect the environment effective...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09788359788 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98202133111 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521164021164 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1863435796 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.642857143 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29889700791 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10439039947 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726875067497 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195745218065 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448433751494 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.