Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
The environmental degradation engendered by transportation has raised an intricate conundrum among a great majority of people. Opinions differ as to whether the government or individuals should take responsibility in dealing with the pollution caused by transportation. Much as I agree that the government is partly responsible for the dispute, I think more duty should be placed on individuals per se.
On the one hand, people who claim that the government is obliged to deal with such a bleak reality of pollution have a number of plausible supports for their viewpoint. To commence with, it has been widely acknowledged that the government is responsible for assuring the safety of a nation’s environment, therefore they unarguably must enforce policies restricting actions that pose threats to its degradation. Moreover, by enacting laws against the rampant utility of transportation, the government shows concern for the prosperity of a region concerning every aspect of it. Such an action would immensely heighten the respect of dwellers to their authority.
Another school of thought, mine included, is that each individual must be accountable for the threat posed by transportation to the environment. Firstly, there is no room for doubt that a fresh atmosphere would ensure a healthy and balanced physical life for every single human being. With that being stated, it is the duty of individuals to maintain an uncontaminated environment, since we are the first ones to benefit from it. Adding further, governmental policies would prove fruitless without the realization of each person's obligation to save the planet. Simply speaking, restraining oneself from a financial benefit at the cost of the environment should be acted out of pure realization in lieu of restriction from an authority, for it is feared that a set of written rules would be overshadowed by a person’s financial greed.
All in all, the above-mentioned discussion has elaborated on why the responsibility is on both the government and individuals. My viewpoint, however, has it that individuals should be obliged to deal with such a looming predicament.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today family members do not eat meals together Why Is this a positive or a negative trend 89
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 78
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advance technology which can prevent and solve crime Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...eat majority of people. Opinions differ as to whether the government or individuals should ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 523, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...uitless without the realization of each persons obligation to save the planet. Simply s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41791044776 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33506986771 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579104477612 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6704872231 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14309160048 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529482704922 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431084811378 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994250999259 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382575917268 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.