Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, issues relating to the environment caused by the humans transit and merchandise are becoming more and more emerging, especially environmental pollution. While some assume that this is due to the misleading of the government, there are opinions that blame the problems on each citizen. From my perspective, it is both the government and people that share the responsibilities for protecting our atmosphere from being contaminated.
First of all, at the governmental level, it is essential to collect precise data on how polluted the environment is due to the wide range of transportations rarely or regularly used. Only by publicizing the figures that have been worsening the situation will people raise awareness of the risks which the nation as a whole is facing with. Therefore, the government, by carrying out research, is completely able to measure the exhaust released by the vehicles into the air. This enables the authority to provide proper strategies for the citizens to minimize the ongoing circumstance. For instance, if the poisonous gas is discharged in a great amount, then reducing the number of vehicles is required. Promulgation to awaken the consciousness of saving the surrounding air is crucial. Regulations on the encouragement of public transports are also an appropriate measurement to be considered.
Secondly, each person needs to perceive that they are contributing to a better future with their small actions. They may not be capable of comprehending every aspect of the situation; however, via the information provided by the authority, they will understand the significance and follow the lead. For example, instead of shipping goods regardless of the quantity, merchants can make sure that each delivery is at its maximum capacity. In addition, the traveling of individuals, as aforementioned, can take place via the public transport system. Buses or high-speed rails are suitable and effective alternatives. Each one, with their correct perception, can have a positive influence on the world they are living in.
In conclusion, both the national administration and citizens should join hands together to lower the negative impact of all kinds of transit. As a matter of fact, it is the interaction between the parties that leads to the better protection of the residence.
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why and what can we do to encourage this 84
- anyone can use mobile phone to answer the work or make personal call at any time of 7 days a week Does this development have positive or negative effect on both individuals and society 56
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- People believe that not all school children have the natural ability to learn new language schools should not force school children to study a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.391184573 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23207069721 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611570247934 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6974483196 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.722222222 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118744607944 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303660799598 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379478526029 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685656155018 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462718994538 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.