Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
A question many people have to ask themselves is whether the trend of online working truly benefits for employers. On one hand, I am inclined to believe that saving time is the main point when it comes to online business discussion. On the other hand, hardly can we deny that every time and again working on social platforms might trigger meaningless conflicts or misunderstandings.
To assess the reason why many individuals have a craving for working online instead of face-to-face interaction, we must bring potential advantages of teleprocessing into focus. Assuming one’s accommodation was far from his workplace, he could directly access and join in any business meetings without sweating. Not only can staff avoid the duties of performing projects on time, but the manager will also create strong bonding and mutual understanding with company members. In addition, you are able to do your job in either vacations or family house without work depressions. On top of that, the less mediocre time you spend on your business firm, the more quality time you gather with other family members.
Although so far, one can readily draw the conclusion that remote working is advantageous, we must put the disadvantages of this trend into perspective before judging whether we should maintain online working habits or not. Difficulty sticking routine or missing important calls, one can miss his chance of a lifetime in his successful path. For instance, you might have struggles whenever you have to ask a super quick question, which only will available in a real workplace. Another issue that many individuals have to face is boredom, which reduces one’s productivity and sets off mental exhaustion.
In conclusion, telecommuting certainly has some beneficial features to it, all of which have attracted loads of businesses to adopt it. From my personal perspective, it is unlikely like teleworking will replace the traditional form of brick-and-mortar workplace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | nhinhi999 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | david_johnson265 | 74 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of a large extended family Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- In many cities, an increasing number of people do not know their neighbors and the sense of community is lost. What are the causes and measures to turn it around? 84
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 67
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32692307692 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03718327542 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7101645494 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879588560359 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292269305901 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284071123574 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509015871575 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252534269828 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.