Research suggests that majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem

It is suggested that numerous offenders who are imprisoned continue to break the law when they are released from prison. This phenomenon may be led by poverty, unemployment, and lack of education, but many measures could be taken to tackle this problem.
To begin with, there are many reasons for reoffending. The first factor is that criminal record could make finding a job more difficult for a prisoner because the employers tend to suspect the prisoners' reliability. Added to that, when some people who break the law do not have a job, they might be addressed with poverty. As a consequence, they may commit crimes again so that they can have money to live. Nevertheless, some offenders who lack education may not be worried about receiving prison sentences again. They continue engaging in criminal activities to gain benefits for themselves and ignore the negative effects that their actions contribute to society.
However, many possible solutions could be taken to avoid criminals from reoffending. In terms of occupation, lawbreakers should be given an equal chance to work and be provided vocational training. If they have suitable skills, they can gain employers' attention and can earn a living without taking part in unlawful acts. For example, if offenders are competent at cooking, they can have the chance of working in restaurants. Moreover, the government needs to impose more severe punishments on the reoffending, which may serve as a deterrent to the criminals to avoid committing an offence again. For example, a robber may be jailed 5 years in prison but if he continues taking part in the unlawful acts, he may be jailed for 6 years.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for committing crimes again, and steps need to be taken to deal with this problem.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'prisoners'' or 'prisoner's'?
Suggestion: prisoners'; prisoner's
...cause the employers tend to suspect the prisoners reliability. Added to that, when some p...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05351170569 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79152241586 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1606071262 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206027177359 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749324602639 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342356121908 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144815646106 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017913211515 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.