The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares the percentage of total spending in a country of Europe in the 40-year period from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, while there was an upward trend occurring in transport, the rest witnessed an opposite trend over the period shown. The figure for food accounted for the largest, while that of fuel and energy took the lowest position.
In 1960, 34% of total expenditure was spent on food, followed by leisure with nearly one-fifth. However, the two figures decreased over the next 40 years, reaching 15% and 11% in 2000 respectively.
In the first year of the period, clothing, transport and fuel, and energy were considered as the minorities. 10% of the total money was spent on clothing and transport each, which doubled the figure for fuel and energy( about 5%). However, while the percentage of transport increased moderately to 15% by 2000, there was a slight decrease in the money spent on clothing and fuel and energy, at just 5% and 2.5% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-04 | nghiemngoc2912 | 75 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- There is a trend of increasing competitiveness in today s society In your opinion is it a good or a bad development 67
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 87
- Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages compared to public transport trains buses and taxis 73
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89696969697 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59277798979 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2058962369 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0788314990188 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399971999433 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473714636912 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639998190093 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535329273441 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.