Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species. Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem. Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Fauna and flora are being destroyed by human activities. Some pessimists say the damage is irreversible, while the optimists believe many effective measures can be taken to better the ecosystem. In my opinion, there are many things we can do to repair the damage, but we have to start as soon as possible before many animals and plants go extinct.
On the one hand, the animals and plants species are endangered because of the negative effect of human activities. That is to say, many people cut down trees to clean the land for agriculture, grazing and timber and may not perceive the permanent damage. As a consequence, the wild flowers and plants tend to disappear and wild animals can lose both the food sources and their homes where there is a favourable environment for them to live. Hence, these animals become endangered, or even encounter extinction.
On the other hand, the natural habitats can be restored by the effort of the community. Governments are trying to come up with efficient measures that can protect and preserve the most sensitive area. They pass laws to encourage afforestation, and make deforestation become an illegal action. There are, for instance, a large number of campaigns about reforesting the land and some people can be arrested for their actions which harm the environment. Since the forests are relieved, the ecosystem can be returned to its original pristine condition. Moreover, the fauna can be protected because they can live in the suitable habitat.
All in all, we have done permanent damage to the environment and animals now are suffering from negative effects. However, it is possible for us to modify the situation if we make an extreme effort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | hellielts | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages compared to public transport trains buses and taxis 73
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 77
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...llegal action. There are, for instance, a large number of campaigns about reforesting the land an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03180212014 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76066953978 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8453089462 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25593719456 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781738510116 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558012860391 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140403569945 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494907115056 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.