Researches into new types of medicine and treatments are essential to improve health and deal with diseases. Who do you think should fund these researches: private companies, individuals or the government?
Faced with a rising number of alien diseases, it is crucial to implement experiments and research regarding the health sector in order to alleviate the severe pain as well as symptoms being caused. In my viewpoint, governing bodies should take the initiative to finance such research for several reasons.
On the one hand, as private corporations and individuals manually fill the tax bill to support specific national aims, it is the government’s duty to provide sustained funds for new treatments for malady remedies, thereby enhancing citizens’ well-being and ensuring everyone can get access to the latest medical innovations. Moreover, there is a high correlation between better human health and productivity gains, as increasing labor force participation rates stem from healthy populations and longevity. Therefore, it contributes to the fact that the nation’s economic output is improved since domestic manufacturing and exporting are encouraged.
On the other hand, medicines backed by industry-sourced expenditures have a likelihood of being overpriced since they include expenses like cutting-edge technology equipment and hiring staff. To be more specific, these private financiers raise the cost of their medical outcomes to maximize revenues, owing to the fact that money is the prime objective for profit-oriented projects. Consequently, a vast majority of the population cannot afford these innovative disease cures, and the impoverished will unfortunately suffer from these fatal illnesses without any help.
To conclude, I firmly believe that governments rather than individualized companies should subsidize medical exploration to stimulate residents’ health and promote economic growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | hanhtrangkit | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-11 | Lee Hwa | 60 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95161290323 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24265759892 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.717741935484 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2233201474 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216087125627 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714751154338 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415839510303 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115106853647 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275471136191 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.