Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rich nations frequently help other nations, especially some poorer countries, by giving some financial aids. However, these aids do not solve the poverty situation in undeveloped countries. Therefore, I believe that developed countries should help undeveloped countries not only by some financial aids but also some other types of help, such as health and education.
Some financial aids are influential for undeveloped countries to improve their economy and their infrastructure. After governments of the undeveloped countries receive these aids, they will have some excellent choices to improve their countries. In Africa, there are plenty of undeveloped countries that are needed helps from other countries, especially wealthy countries, such as U.S.A, Russia, China, and Japan. Due to some help from these countries, the infrastructures of some poor localities are repaired and improved. However, some financial aids cannot completely solve the poverty situation of these undeveloped nations.
Therefore, some rich nations should give some poorer nations by other types of help, such as health and education. For instance, if a country receives educational supports from developed countries, that country will have more advanced workers and scientists. Hence, it is easy to clarify that the country will be an excellent place to attract some famous branding companies, and more job opportunities will be created for local people. Moreover, if the country receives health supports from developed countries and has some job opportunities from some large companies, people can apply to these companies to earn money to live their family and improve their country.
To sum up, rich nations should give not only some finance aids but also some other types, like health and education, to undeveloped countries, which will help these countries more completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period Summarise 67
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 61
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...pecially wealthy countries, such as U.S.A, Russia, China, and Japan. Due to some ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62277580071 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83932691551 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462633451957 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5088213338 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.538461538 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306291779472 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14372482534 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688515096402 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239326368801 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648914897518 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.