Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that poor countries usually take funds from richer countries in order to solve poverty is becoming very popular. However the question: Is it helpful to give money only or should they consider providing other variety of charity to the poor countries. I partially agree that other way of helping the countries that is lower will be more helpful than money. It depends on the place and whether they will use the money correctly or not. In this essay, I am going to examine the phenomenon from both viewpoints.
On one side of the argument I believe that giving money to the government of unwilling country will help it to establish building and sites that can attract visitors from all around the world. If the president of the country is wise enough then he will know where to spend the money and how to get it back twice. For example, if the country used the money to build more workplaces, then the migration will decrease. Eventually the country will start to grow.
On the other hand, it is also possible to consider it with the opposing case. What if the country's president is not wise enough to reconstruct the country with money he was given. In this case, the rich countries should use this money to open the businesses in the poor places. An agreement can be done by the government on the proportion of money divided on both countries.
As we have seen, there are no easy answer to this question. On balance, I tend to believe that it should be considered by high authorities and there should be an agreement between both countries about what policy to consider.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...solve poverty is becoming very popular. However the question: Is it helpful to give mon...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'answers'?
Suggestion: answers
.... As we have seen, there are no easy answer to this question. On balance, I tend to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, for example, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64310954064 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46665383181 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515901060071 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1202774853 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373201886808 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127559627545 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909891565302 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22765890344 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752833119143 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.