Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rich countries have helped poorer countries financially for decades now. It’s time for a change! Other ways of aid should be given. This essay will argue whether developed countries should give other types of support to developing countries or not. I think it is completely necessary to give support in other ways other than money.
Some people believe that financial support is a good option because, the country can choose what to do with the money. For instance, if they have more schools than hospitals, they will choose to put most of the money on hospitals rather than schools. They also believe it is much easier to provide money rather than buy the resources and find a way to transport the resources. For example, if a developed country would like to provide poor countries with school equipments like desks, chairs and boards, they will have to buy them and send an airplane to transport all the resources.
However, there are other alternative ways for aid other than money that underdeveloped countries will find more useful. For example, receiving food will definitely solve the issues of hunger. Also, financial support can lead to corruption if handled by the wrong people. For instance, people can take the money and spend it on illegal items such as, drugs. So it would be of no benefit for the country and it definitely won’t solve poverty. Therefore, direct support to poor countries will be of great benefit.
In conclusion, this essay argued that there are other forms of support other than finiancial support that would benefit countries in need. In my opinion providing money is not the best form of help to underdeveloped countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 89
- Topic Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 61
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rm of help to underdeveloped countries.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98566308244 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56463572579 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512544802867 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9772063257 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390832597572 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140982393436 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104594310309 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256674576297 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120330725291 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.