Robots can free people from difficult and dangerous work. However, some people are worried about the possible dangers robots may create. Discuss the benefits of using robots and the possible dangers from it.
Individuals can be liberated from hazardous and challenging tasks by human-made technology, yet, others are concerned about the potential risks of it. From my standpoint, some significant merits can be elicited from this nation along with the demerits which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragraph.
With regard to some beneficial aspects, the robot utilisations for rescuing humans in harmful and complicated works increase productivity performing tasks faster and with greater precision. They might work around the clock without breaks both to ensure continuous operation and to receive profitable productions. In the automotive sector, robots are employed to paint car exteriors consistently and assemble complex parts for minimising errors. Moreover, it reduces the risk of injury and accidents in the workplace, especially crucial in high-risk sectors (construction and underwater exploration). As seen in the mining industry, excavators are used for drilling and exploration in areas posing potential risks of explosions and mine collapse.
Turning to the drawbacks, a significant drop in workforce because of technological advances dominates the economic cycle, causing most industries to lay-off labourers. For instance, Japan integrates robotic waitstaff into their restaurant operations, potentially threatening human jobs that lead to higher unemployment rates. In addition, interpersonal skills may diminish in the immediate environment. The more societies rely on robots to handle aspects of work, the more it lessens individuals' initiative to find the solutions collectively with partners. Seemingly, the medication-delivery robots barely replace human nurses in patient care, detracting the essential social interactions needed for optimal recovery.
Overall, the presence of intelligent AI for helping societies raises the upsides ranging from boosting industrial output to minimising fatal effects of work. Meanwhile, the downsides that we could see are employee reduction and poor social contact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Nowadays employment options are changing and employees cannot rely on having v the same job 1 and working v conditions 2 throughout their life What are some possible causes Suggest some ways to plan for the future under these circumstances 80
- Some young people like to copy the behaviour and clothes of famous people today Why might this be the case What problems can it cause 89
- Some think dangerous extreme sports such as skydiving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree 89
- Many today feel that attention spans are becoming shorter due to the prevalence of social media To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...is nation along with the demerits which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragr...
^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...kplace, especially crucial in high-risk sectors construction and underwater exploration...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06271777003 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19072838257 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.707317073171 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7488242883 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163806415281 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478105785697 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347518412929 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893780035267 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290991670888 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.06 8.58950901804 140% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.