School should not force children learn a foreign language.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is suggested that educational institutions should allow schoolers to forgo foreign language classes. In my opinion, it is a reasonable decision to make language training a non-compulsory course, and learners should be entitled to decide themselves whether or not they wish to master the languages.
It may be easily understood that some formal educational institutions classify learning a foreign language as a mandatory subject just because it could benefit students. Rapid globalization along with cultural exchange helps people stay connected regardless of their nationalities or religions. So it is clearly seen that a person would have more favor when he or she is capable of speaking another language in a fluent manner, especially if that person is in the fields of business and entertainment. Knowing that, schools at all levels emphasize solely on the importance of the second language so as to provide the learners with better opportunities as they embark on career paths later.
The stress on foreign languages may sound sensible to some extent, but its stress should not be the mainstream category in the schooling guideline. Firstly, it is a waste of students’ time should they be compelled to learn the second language. Usually they have to memorize and get accustomed to plenty of language materials such as lexis, syntax and vocab enunciation, which might sometimes be complicated towards young learners. For example, most international elementary schools teach students every single subject in English, including literature, instead of giving instructions on how to pronounce and use their mother tongue correctly, which culminates in the majority of junior learners’ incompetence in the first language. The result of such time and effort burning activity might not be as good as the school panel anticipates, and in fact, in many schools, it produces a dismal failure. Secondly, time and effort invested in the foreign language could result in students’ shortage of concentration on other important subjects that would be an effective gear for their future specialized areas at university and in the labor market. After all, foreign languages are exclusively an aid enabling practitioners to handle more effectively in communication and negotiation at work; an adequate comprehension of more languages would suffice for message conveyance to others. It is the truth that the key to success in a profession requires more than just acquiring a proficient level of multiple languages, so a strong focus on these subjects would downplay the importance of other disciplines which actually contribute to their job accomplishment.
In summary, children should have the permission to select their language classes. This is because they need to spend time mastering the first language, and there are more major subjects to be mainly learned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Topic Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a frog Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the development of the cutting tool in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...should be entitled to decide themselves whether or not they wish to master the languages. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 408, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fluent manner" with adverb for "fluent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...is capable of speaking another language in a fluent manner, especially if that person is in the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n the importance of the second language so as to provide the learners with better opport...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, after all, as to, for example, in fact, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42376681614 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08458660698 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562780269058 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1530055086 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.1875 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186154585768 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686448245739 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587845526396 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117655889098 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205503638101 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.