It will be better for both individuals and society if driverless cars – cars can drive themselves – become more widely spread.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since the first appearance of steam engines, scientists have rocketly developed over the past decades which make the idea of driverless cars not seem so impossible anymore. I believe that these automatic cars will change our lives positively forever.
We as humans always try to manage our time as wisely as possible in order to have more experience before we die. But some research has shown that we often spend about 1-2 hours a day driving to work or moving from different areas. That is why the appearance of automatic cars will help make use of our transportation time. While we spend 2 hours holding the wheel, we can relax, read books or work instead thanks to these driverless cars. We don’t have to drive so it will save us from suffering the endless waiting that is caused by traffic jams. To extend, not only can we use our time more effectively but it will also reduce our stress, depression and anger.
Every year, the number of people who die because of car crashes, and multiple other kinds of accidents always stay as the number one reason causing the death of thousands of people. That is why using automatic cars will definitely be safer and will reduce the amount of death. To extend, driverless cars are usually covered with sensation machines, programmed with all the safety guides, and functioned by AI, so the safety level is promising, and insured. An automatic car is logically functioning, so they will never break laws which as humans, we can’t guarantee. Owning a driverless car will also help us in unpredictable situations such as driving when we are not sober, or unconscious and save us tons of charged fines.
To conclude, automatic driverless cars will have a huge impact on our life and change society in a better way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the Internet Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 100
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference center in 2010 and 2025 as proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- A lot of people spend a major part of their adult life at work so job satisfaction is very important for individual happiness What are the main factors that contribute to job satisfaction What are the solutions for people who are unsatisfied with their jo 73
- People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To extend, not only can we use our time more effectively but it will also reduce...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d functioned by AI, so the safety level is promising, and insured. An automatic car is logic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78032786885 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56748737098 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580327868852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5635955494 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221504590919 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867136086836 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481527920074 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153701311868 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423945063767 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.