It will be better for both individuals and society if driverless cars – cars can drive themselves – become more widely spread.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since dramatic advances in automotive technology over the past few decades, the impossible dream of driverless cars has become realized. Personally, I think this development can aid both individuals in particular and the whole society in general because of its utmost convenience, accessibility as well as safety.
On the individual scale, autonomous automobiles make driving more convenient and accessible. To begin with, drivers can utilize their spare time to engage in other activities. Because of the ultimate function of self-driving, they have total freedom to read books, play games or even have phone conversations with friends without paying attention to the road, which makes the journey experiences both comfortable and liberating. Besides, this mode of transportation offer higher accessibility for motorists having trouble with driving, particularly senior and disabled citizens. Such groundbreaking vehicles can afford those people the independence of car travel as they pose little to no risk to drivers around them.
At the societal level, self-driving cars are beneficial, for they are less likely to cause traffic accidents. This is because these cars are equipped with the sensory system which can perceive the surroundings far more superior than that of humans. Therefore, split-second decisions can be made such as accelerating or decreasing the velocity or even braking sensibly to keep nearby vehicles and passengers secure. According to projections from the US, the rate of traffic fatality rate will have been diminished by the mid-21st century when these cares become ubiquitous.
In conclusion, thanks to the aforementioned positive points, I hold a strong belief that autonomous cars would enormously benefit both citizens and the community. Government should rev up investment in the manufacture of this vehicle types so that they could be a common sight in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The diagram shows a method of shaping glass containers Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Many people believe that cities should not try to preserve its old historic buildings and instead they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings To what extent do you agree
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested about finding out the history of the house or the building the live in Why is this the case How can people research this 89
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects KHANH HOMEWORK MAY 29 56
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...which can perceive the surroundings far more superior than that of humans. Therefore, split-second...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58620689655 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09365504635 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68275862069 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8136187968 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221428616554 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707107023506 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381842108151 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125440484742 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376511134619 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.