In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed?
There is sufficient evidence to infer that in various educational levels, schoolgirls have a tendency to interest in art field while sciences gain popularity in another gender. This trend is resulted by several reasons and from my perspective, it is better if this tendency does not apply any change.
It is undeniable that there are certain reasons constitute this trend. The primary reason is due to gender-specific personalities and competence. To be more specific, while male students have considerable analytical abilities, followed by the fact that they are attracted by a number of science subjects, female students seem to expose their attention in imagination fields. Furthermore, it is obvious that this trend is associated with the traditional mindset about what field both genders should take a decision to pursue. For example, sometimes it is a real challenge for women who giving priority to difficult subjects such as math or physic because, in certain countries, conservative people do not agree with this idea.
On the other hand, whether the tendency should adjust is a controversial issue. In fact, what the society and the labour market need is not the adjustment, but people who can expose their incredible talent in the specific major. As a result, I am in the support of the opinion that this contemporary trend does not need any method to change because each person all over the world has a right to choose the environment where they can best cultivate their aptitudes. No sooner the students have their own freedom in making decision than they are motivated to make advantageous contributions to their major, regardless of gender.
In conclusion, there are a myriad of reasons why girls are more likely to keen on arts while boys concentrate on science subjects. However, it seems to me that young generations should have a reasonable option to follow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Nguyễn vũ long | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nagakhoa | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Niusha | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-21 | emmanuelbilla90@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | simii | 78 | view |
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its member are gradually changing.What kind of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 78
- Some believe that it is good for a country’s culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and tv programmes.Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 66
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 81
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity ? 78
- : Nowadays many people spend too much their time on shopping malls. Some people fear that this has negative effects on young people and the society they live in.To what extent do you agree of disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...of gender. In conclusion, there are a myriad of reasons why girls are more likely to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1335504886 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91991520153 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1240083884 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29992951209 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994754949174 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665109528968 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174259985729 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460412852123 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.